08/03: Serially, wtf...
One of the system's rules (that's been in effect since December 2010) was just found out to tell the user to reply to the email regarding missing information, but the email they reply to is a box that is not monitored and eventually bounces back the email. We've just heard about this for the first time today. Ugh. Why tell them to reply to an email address that does not accept emails?!